What triggers the Section 106 review process?
What is a Federal undertaking?
What is an historic property?
What standards does DHR use in project review?
What is DHR's expected response time?
What are the responsibilities of the Federal agency?
Can other participants consult with DHR on behalf of the responsible Federal agency?
Who must find out if historic properties are in the project area?
What other parties may be involved?
Who pays for any necessary surveys?
What are the responsibilities of DHR?
What are the responsibilities of the Federal Advisory Council on Historic Preservation?
Who has decision-making authority?
Can the Section 106 review process stop a project?
Does the process require the preservation of all historic properties?
Does Section 106 require accurate restoration of historic structures?
Does Section 106 prevent new construction in historic areas?
What triggers the Section 106 review process? It is the nature of the project (for
instance, if it is federally funded, licensed, or permitted), not the
presence of a historic property, that triggers the review process.
What is a Federal undertaking? An "undertaking" means a project, activity, or program funded in whole or in part under the direct or indirect jurisdiction of a federal agency. "Federal" means under the direct or indirect jurisdiction of a Federal agency. Federal undertakings usually take one of four forms:
What is an historic property? Under
Federal law, an
historic property is any district, site, building, structure, or object that is listed in or
eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places.
What standards does DHR use in project review? To ensure consistency
in its review of both Federal and state undertakings, DHR uses The Secretary of the Interior's
Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation (1983). The Secretary's Standards
establish professional standards for the identification, evaluation, registration, and
treatment of historic properties. DHR also provides report preparation and survey guidelines
to help government agencies (the project sponsors) and their consultants meet these standards.
What is DHR's expected response time? DHR usually provides comments within 30 days of
receipt of a complete review package. Statutory timeframe for the Section 106 review process
are given on the website of the
Advisory Council for Historic Preservation.
What are the responsibilities of the Federal agency? Federal agencies are required for
all undertakings subject to Section 106 to clearly define the scope of their undertaking,
develop an Area of Potential Effect (APE), make a reasonable and good-faith effort to identify
and evaluate historic properties, and to assess the project's effects when historic
properties are found. If adverse effects are identified, the Federal agency must avoid,
minimize, or mitigate those effects. This process of compliance is carried out in consultation
with DHR, which serves as the State Historic Preservation Office in Virginia. DHR has developed
an Electronic Project Information Exchange (ePIX) system to facilitate this consultation.
Other consulting parties include the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation,
Indian tribes that attach religious or cultural significance to historic properties that may be
affected by an undertaking, local governments, interested public, and other stakeholders.
Can other participants consult with DHR on behalf of the responsible Federal agency? Although
Federal agencies are responsible for completion of all steps of the Section 106 process,
certain Federal agencies transfer some of these responsibilities to others. For example,
applicants for Federal financial assistance or for Federal permits may be required to
provide information about the project directly to the SHPO and to complete the step of
identification in consultation with the SHPO.
Who must find out if historic properties are in the project area? The
Federal agency is
responsible for making a reasonable and good-faith effort to locate historic properties
that may be affected by an undertaking. In addition to reviewing information on properties
already listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the agency must consult other sources,
like local preservation groups, that might have knowledge about historic properties that are
documented but have not yet been considered for listing. DHR is a primary source of information.
The agency must also ask the department's opinion about whether previously unidentified resources
exist in the affected area. After reviewing available information and the opinion of DHR, the
agency may take further actions, such as conducting surveys to locate historic properties.
What other parties may be involved? Organizations and individuals concerned with the effects of
an undertaking on historic properties may be involved in the 106 review process. Interested parties
may include: local governments, applicants for Federal assistance, licenses or permits,
Americans, landowners, other members of the public, and private-sector organizations and groups.
Interested parties should contact DHR and the responsible Federal agency.
Who pays for any necessary surveys? The
Federal agency responsible for the undertaking
generally pays for any necessary surveys. However, some agencies require applicants for
Federal financial assistance or permits to meet these costs as a condition of approval.
What are the responsibilities of DHR? DHR provides information, guidance, expertise, and leadership
in historic preservation for the Commonwealth. The department coordinates the
preservation program in the state and serves as an important link between the
government and the citizens of Virginia. No separate permit is issued by DHR in the Section 106
What are the responsibilities of the
Federal Advisory Council on Historic Preservation? The
Advisory Council is responsible for commenting to Federal agency officials on undertakings
that affect historic properties. The Advisory Council is an independent
Federal agency that
carries out Section 106 reviews, advises the President, Congress, and
Federal agencies on
historic preservation, and provides education and training.
Who has decision-making authority? Authority to decide the course of a proposed Federal undertaking rests with the Federal agency providing the funding, license, or permit. The recommendations of DHR and the Advisory Council must be considered by the sponsoring Federal agency, but the agency itself retains all decision-making authority. In determining whether a property is eligible for the national register, the Keeper of the national register has final authority. Top
Can the Section 106 review process stop a project? No. The Advisory Council, DHR, and the process
cannot stop a project. The process can take time, especially if the
Federal agency is slow
to initiate consultation in the first phase, does not provide complete information, or the
Federal agency and DHR are not in agreement as to the effect of a project on historic properties.
Section 106 review should proceed concurrently with other environmental reviews. When Section
106 is considered early in the planning process, projects should not be delayed.
Does the process require the preservation of all historic properties? No. The Secretary of the
Standards for Rehabilitation, the Advisory Council, and DHR all acknowledge that, in
some cases, historic buildings, structures, and sites may not be preserved without unreasonable
investments. In other cases, there may be no reasonable alternatives to demolition. In such cases,
the department may recommend excavation of an archaeological site, or written and photographic
documentation of a building prior to its destruction.
Does Section 106 require accurate restoration of historic structures? No. The process encourages
the rehabilitation of historic structures, a process by which old buildings can be repaired
and brought up to modern standards without losing their historic character. The Secretary of the
Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, the Advisory Council, and DHR all acknowledge that,
in some cases, accurate restoration may not be possible, economically feasible, or even desirable.
Information on conducting rehabilitations according to The Secretary of the Interior's Standards
Does Section 106 prevent new construction in historic areas? No. In some cases, new
construction is encouraged in historic areas. If new construction is proposed in an historic area,
the project is evaluated to see how it might affect the historic character of the area. If the
project will cause destruction of historic buildings or archaeological sites, or if the
project is incompatible with the historic setting, the Section 106 process may result in
revisions to the project design.